Iran has dismissed reports of an impending major agreement with the United States, emphasizing that several critical issues remain unresolved. Despite progress in negotiations, Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei noted that while many points of understanding have been reached, it is premature to declare a final deal imminent. He attributed the delay to conflicting statements from Washington and interference from Israel.
A significant aspect of the discussions involves reopening the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping. Iran clarified its stance, indicating no plans to impose tolls on ships but suggesting potential charges for navigational and environmental protection services, coordinated with Oman. Additionally, Iran insists that any agreement must include a ceasefire in Lebanon and the lifting of restrictions on Iranian ports and shipping activities.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged ongoing discussions and described the proposal on the table as significant. The framework reportedly includes a 30-day period after a ceasefire when Iran would clear mines from the Strait of Hormuz and restore full maritime access. Meanwhile, the US military confirmed conducting strikes in southern Iran targeting missile launch sites and boats allegedly preparing to lay mines, actions Washington described as self-defense while continuing to support ceasefire efforts.
US President Donald Trump stated that the final agreement would need to be “great and meaningful” or there would be no deal at all. He also urged several Middle Eastern countries to join the Abraham Accords and normalize relations with Israel, though regional leaders reportedly showed little interest in the proposal. Another sticking point is Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Tehran has shown willingness to temporarily reduce enrichment levels but has rejected demands to transfer its uranium stockpile abroad. Iran is also seeking the release of billions of dollars in frozen assets held overseas.
Iranian officials argue that political divisions within the US, including criticism from Congress and sections of the Republican Party, are putting pressure on the White House and complicating negotiations. The proposed agreement currently does not address Iran’s ballistic missile program or its support for regional armed groups, making it less comprehensive than previous US demands.